← Search

Fergus Caldicott

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 11W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Fergus Caldicott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-08-08 · MAC-Boehm · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Heinecke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · MAC-Boehm · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Heinecke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · MAC-Boehm · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erin Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · MAC-Boehm · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Hagerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · MAC-Boehm · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · MAC-Caldicott · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Caldicott · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · MAC-Caldicott · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Kovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Kovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-04 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 42.7% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.4% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 25.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#1 Singles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe