MAC-Stevenson

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10

Jason Trinchero

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3

2.95

David Graham

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.87

Matthew Casimo

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3

2.84

Jay Hopson

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.82

Scott Soot

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.78

Brian Chenoweth

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.77

Fergus Caldicott

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.75

Brian Parker

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.72

Wayne Corrick

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.61

Jeff Kovel

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.26

Kip Stevenson

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Jason Trinchero

30W–15L career

0%53%47%

3.10

David Graham

46W–35L career

0%89%11%

2.95

Matthew Casimo

39W–103L career

0%97%3%

2.87

Jay Hopson

38W–30L career

0%98%2%

2.84

Scott Soot

35W–43L career

0%97%2%

2.82

Brian Chenoweth

36W–52L career

0%99%1%

2.78

Fergus Caldicott

10W–32L career

1%99%0%

2.77

Brian Parker

36W–48L career

1%99%0%

2.75

Wayne Corrick

0W–3L career · type S

11%86%4%

2.72

Jeff Kovel

14W–32L career · type A

14%86%0%

2.61

2.5

Kip Stevenson

35W–94L career

0%92%8%

2.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.