← Search

Brian Parker

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 36W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brian Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-06-27 · MAC-Bourland · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Fox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chenoweth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · MAC-Caldicott · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chenoweth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Bayless championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · MAC-Caldicott · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chenoweth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fergus Caldicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-11 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurel Soot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-04 · MAC-Caldicott · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Kovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Madeleine Bourland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · MAC-Stevenson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fergus Caldicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-07 · MAC-Stevenson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fergus Caldicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
34.8%
16W–30L · 45.5% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams