Teams

MAC-Bourland

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.1 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Paul Garrahan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Lisa Howlett
published 3.5
3.10
Jason Trinchero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.08
Adrienne Dedelow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Jennifer Bayless
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Brian Chenoweth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Brian Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.26
Kip Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paul Garrahan
129W–39L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–96L career
0%91%9%
3.45
3.5
Lisa Howlett
31W–21L career · type S
5%91%4%
3.26
3
Jason Trinchero
30W–15L career
0%53%47%
3.10
3
Adrienne Dedelow
35W–35L career
0%57%43%
3.08
3
Jennifer Bayless
61W–13L career
0%76%24%
3.02
3
Brian Chenoweth
36W–52L career
0%99%1%
2.78
3
Brian Parker
36W–48L career
1%99%0%
2.75
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72
2.5
Kip Stevenson
35W–94L career
0%92%8%
2.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.