Search

Heeseung Kang

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
92 matches · 32W–60L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 37 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
89%
stay 2.5
11%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.34. Lower than today’s 2.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
22 of 34
OR · 2.5
42 of 61

Heeseung is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Heeseung has been a steady 2.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.02.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Heeseung has gone from the 26th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
41.4%
24W–34L · 47.6% of games
3.0
0%
0W–8L · 21.6% of games
6.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 36.3% of games
6.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ned Cannon
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Walker
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 22% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Michelle Ubell
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Yihe Dong
2026-06-05 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.062below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Karissa Ditgen / Lora Lord
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne Savery
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Libby Anderson
2026-05-24 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.059better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Walker
+0.000about as expected — took 20% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Dani McLaughlin / Rachel Leslie
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne Savery
0.017below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Barbara Roozenboom / Maarten Schreudermixed
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Aebi
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Leah Pang Garcia
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.016better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Caitlin Kinlein
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Aebi
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.