Teams

SHC-Hoxie

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-22vs CRRC-Kimmel/WroblewskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Huff / Allison Bader vs Erika Anderson / Katy Wroblewski6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHeeseung Kang vs Katalin Wiggins2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Hoxie / Jennifer West vs Dana McNeil / Michelle Walker6-1, 7-5
2026-03-20vs VTC-Case/LordWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Bader / Margaret Huff vs Terry Anderson / Elizabeth Platz6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHeeseung Kang vs Kendra Binney1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan McMaster / Marcia Hartson vs Amanda Weatherby / Wendy Chase5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-03-14vs N OR-IRV-SebastianLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcia Hartson / Melissa Gitt vs Cory Sebastian / Philberta Leung4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJulie Hoxie vs Andrea Cedfeldt1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer West / Susan McMaster vs Cecily Schmidt / Thea von Geldern0-6, 3-6
2026-02-21vs VTC-Case/LordLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeeseung Kang / Jennifer West vs Kristin Case / Karissa Ditgen1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Hoxie vs Erin Shamieh2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia Hartson / Melissa Gitt vs Elizabeth Platz / Terry Anderson6-2, 7-6
2026-02-14vs MAC-Decker/FowlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeeseung Kang / Jennifer West vs Allyson Purcell / Jane Crisan2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Hoxie vs Jessica Decker6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan McMaster / Marcia Hartson vs Jennifer Fowler / Kathryn Williams5-7, 1-6
2026-02-01vs PT&E/SJRC-Diaz de Leon/JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Bader / Margaret Huff vs Carrie Jones / Stephanie Trullinger6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMelissa Gitt vs Nicole Burrell7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Hoxie / Susan McMaster vs Penny Mclain / Mai Lynn Miller Nguyen6-0, 6-0
2026-01-10vs CRRC-Kimmel/WroblewskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer West / Melissa Gitt vs Erika Anderson / Dana McNeil2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHeeseung Kang vs Lauren Kimmel3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Huff / Allison Bader vs Lauren Fiala / Katalin Wiggins6-0, 6-1
2026-01-03vs N OR-IRV-SebastianSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Huff / Allison Bader vs Sanam Dowlatdad / Cecily Schmidt2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Gitt vs Dana Valverde7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Jennifer West
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.43
Julie Hoxie
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.41
Margaret Huff
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.39
Allison Bader
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.26
Melissa Gitt
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.25
Heeseung Kang
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.17
Susan McMaster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Marcia Hartson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Bader + Margaret Huff5356% games−5.1% vs expected
Margaret Huff + Heeseung Kang134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer West + Julie Hoxie314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Jennifer West
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
2.5
Julie Hoxie
10W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Margaret Huff
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Allison Bader
42W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Melissa Gitt
10W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Heeseung Kang
32W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Susan McMaster
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Marcia Hartson
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.