← Search

Catherine Greenblatt

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 52W–83L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Catherine Greenblatt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-09-13 · GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Clevenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-12 · GLVR-Robertson/Jansen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Grainger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-23 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kenneth Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · GLVR-Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Grissom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve DeKlotz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve DeKlotz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-6
L
2026-04-25 · GLVR-Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Archer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-19 · GLVR-Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Dragoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · GLVR-Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Dragoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve DeKlotz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 52.7% of games
3.5
21.6%
8W–29L · 37.7% of games
7.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 44.5% of games
6.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 66.9% of games
7.0mixed
27.6%
8W–21L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer