Search

Michael Rich

BEAVERTON, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
121 matches · 45W–76L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
56%
stay 3.0
44%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 87% stay · 13% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
140 of 600

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams85 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michael has gone from the 55th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.2% of games
3.5
16%
4W–21L · 37% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 36.7% of games
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
8W–20L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history121 matches
W
Kyle Carnaroli / Zeb Wichert
2026-07-29 · Pang Garcia · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Tom Schneider
+0.024better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
8-2
W
Lindsay Jenkins / Eric Delehoymixed
2026-07-18 · THPRD-Fitzpatrick/McQueen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chili He
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Daniel Ellis / Ned Cannon
2026-07-16 · Pang Garcia · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Shayne Leong
+0.003about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
7-5
W
Xiaohan Liu / Calvin Liang
2026-07-13 · Pang Garcia · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Derek Liu-Shein
+0.081better than expected — took 89% of games against 47% expected
8-1
W
Phyllis Shen / Dave Rammmixed
2026-07-12 · THPRD-Fitzpatrick/McQueen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chili He
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Dave Gillard / Ned Cannonchamps
2026-06-19 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · with Amit Sharma
0.075below expectation — took 28% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Jinman Jun / Seung-Hee Bae
2026-06-13 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Brown
+0.025better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Umang Patel
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Greg Passmore / Zachary Kersten
2026-05-31 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Brown
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Alvin Lym / Brian Nguyen
2026-05-23 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monte Gonzales
+0.083better than expected — took 44% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Edwin Becker / Shaun Andersonmixed
2026-05-22 · THPRD-Bailey/Dellinger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Bowman
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · THPRD-Bailey/Dellinger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rie Sasakawa
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.