← Search

Michael Rich

BEAVERTON, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 47W–78L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Michael Rich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-09-12 · THPRD-Rich/Roberts/Jessup · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yvette Alatorre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · THPRD-Fitzpatrick/McQueen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chili He mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · THPRD-Fitzpatrick/McQueen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Fitzpatrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Pang Garcia · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Tom Schneider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-2
W
2026-07-18 · THPRD-Fitzpatrick/McQueen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chili He mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Daniel Ellis / Ned Cannon
2026-07-16 · Pang Garcia · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Shayne Leong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7
W
Xiaohan Liu / Calvin Liang
2026-07-13 · Pang Garcia · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Derek Liu-Shein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-1
W
2026-07-13 · Pang Garcia · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Raquel Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-3
W
2026-07-12 · THPRD-Fitzpatrick/McQueen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chili He mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Amit Sharma championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-13 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Umang Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.2% of games
3.5
16%
4W–21L · 37% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 36.7% of games
0.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.3% of games
6.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
8W–20L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams