← Teams

LOTC-Mounts/Rich

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Ruben Alaniz
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
3.03
Seth Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.01
John Brady
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Michael Rich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Amit Sharma
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.91
Monte Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jim Mounts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jeff Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Paul Best
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
David Lomartire
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Jeff Mcdougald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Scott Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Ruben Alaniz
33W–23L career
0%33%67%
3.17
3
Seth Wagner
51W–76L career
0%73%27%
3.03
3
John Brady
71W–76L career
0%81%19%
3.01
3
Michael Rich
45W–76L career
0%83%17%
2.99
3
Amit Sharma
12W–10L career
0%89%11%
2.94
3
Monte Gonzales
118W–97L career
0%95%5%
2.91
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%3%
2.86
3
Jeff Gonzales
19W–58L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%2%
2.84
3
David Lomartire
21W–28L career
1%99%1%
2.78
3
Jeff Mcdougald
19W–16L career
1%98%1%
2.77
3
Scott Quinn
74W–62L career
1%99%0%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.