Search

Amit Sharma

PORTLAND, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
22 matches · 12W–10L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
78%
stay 3.0
22%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.94 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
PORTLAND · 3.0
7 of 15
OR · 3.0
186 of 600

Amit is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
LOTC-Mounts/Rich
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2026
LOTC-Mounts/Rich
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2026
N OR-LOTC-Mounts
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
N OR-LOTC-Mounts
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
THPRD-Venkatasubramanian
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amit has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Amit has gone from the 100th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 62.6% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history22 matches
L
Dave Gillard / Ned Cannonchamps
2026-06-19 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · with Michael Rich
0.075below expectation — took 28% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Gijun Lee / Kyu Hun Kim
2026-06-13 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Brady
+0.014better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monte Gonzales
0.039below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Rich
0.083below expectation — took 48% of games against 71% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Bowman
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Luis Ortiz / Chris Cormack
2026-03-15 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bishu Guha
0.026about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jungjoo Lee / Donghyup Ryu
2026-03-14 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bishu Guha
+0.002better than expected — took 92% of games against 77% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bishu Guha
0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Lomartire
0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fred Sutardjo
0.050below expectation — took 53% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Todd Berinstein / Philip Meltzer
2026-02-14 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bishu Guha
0.014about as expected — took 75% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Brett Schoepper / David Harper
2026-01-24 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Mounts
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.