← Search

Monte Gonzales

West Linn, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 118W–99L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Monte Gonzales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-09-11 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Bill Rhoades championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with John Brady championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-23 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amit Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.1%
49W–19L · 60% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.1% of games
6.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 54% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
44.3%
27W–34L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal