CRRC-Ash

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.09 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36

Garret Glenn

usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 3.5

3.25

Jeremy Harkin

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.24

Julia Henry

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

3.15

Ryan Owens

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

2.91

Monte Gonzales

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.83

Erik Bucher

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.79

Carol Glenn

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.75

Karin Owens

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.75

Nicola Ash

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.66

Jake Janovetz

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3

2.60

Michelle Ellett

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Garret Glenn

84W–56L career

0%98%2%

3.36

Jeremy Harkin

46W–45L career

0%12%88%

3.25

Julia Henry

87W–52L career

0%15%85%

3.24

3.5

Ryan Owens

113W–77L career

5%95%0%

3.15

Monte Gonzales

118W–97L career

0%95%5%

2.91

Erik Bucher

79W–60L career

0%98%2%

2.83

Carol Glenn

82W–81L career

0%99%1%

2.79

Karin Owens

82W–66L career

1%99%0%

2.75

Nicola Ash

114W–136L career

1%99%0%

2.75

Jake Janovetz

5W–14L career

6%94%0%

2.66

Michelle Ellett

41W–39L career

20%80%0%

2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.