← Search

Deborah Self

VANCOUVER, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 107W–100L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Deborah Self to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history207 matches
W
2026-09-13 · VTC-Sirr/Tsi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Araujo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Araujo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frank Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-2
W
2026-06-23 · Slice is Right · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · VTC-Locke/Barta · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Darling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.2% of games
3.0
54.9%
50W–41L · 53.4% of games
3.5
25.6%
10W–29L · 40.6% of games
5.5
75%
9W–3L · 64.9% of games
6.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.4% of games
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.8% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
41 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams