← Search

Samantha Damiano

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 57W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Samantha Damiano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-08-07 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Locke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adriana McCord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-24 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-23 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Shu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Heredia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Starkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adriana McCord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
7W–7L · 53.5% of games
3.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 54.9% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 40.6% of games
6.0mixed
80%
20W–5L · 63.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#1 Female Doubles
14%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova