← Search

Vicki Mark

PORTLAND, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 47W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vicki Mark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Mihee Park championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Ace-I-Go · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mihee Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · Ace-I-Go · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mihye Ko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Ace-I-Go · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mihee Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Ace-I-Go · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mihee Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · WHRC-Ha · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aera Seo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Jong Bum Park championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · WHRC-Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doyoung Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · WHRC-Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jong Bum Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · WHRC-Ha · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mihye Ko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · WHRC-Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel M Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · with Woohyung Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2010–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 63.1% of games
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 51.8% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.9% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer