Search

Shuping Li

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
156 matches · 86W–70L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
252 of 357
OR · 3.0
420 of 600

Shuping is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams37 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shuping has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shuping has gone from the 10th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
53.8%
43W–37L · 50.2% of games
6.0
64%
16W–9L · 57.2% of games
6.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history156 matches
W
Azure Olson / Suki Birge
2026-07-06 · FreeBird · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Kuo
+0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · FreeBird · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise D Harvey
+0.030about as expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Rie Yuasa / Amy Liuchamps
2026-06-21 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #3 Doubles · with Ying Deng
0.059below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · FreeBird · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ying Deng
+0.017better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Molly Briscoe / Elena Buller
2026-06-13 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeny Joseph
0.054below expectation — took 25% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Kimberly Wisniewski / Kelly Powers
2026-06-10 · FreeBird · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Kuo
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Sarah Bills / Nicole Kennely
2026-05-30 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Chow
+0.015better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Robyn Aoyagi / Denyse Stawicki
2026-05-17 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeny Joseph
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Ruhsenberger
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Floyd
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Kahle
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Kahle
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.