← Search

Teresa Metke

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 26W–52L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Teresa Metke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-09-13 · SHC-McBee/Wilkins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Perla Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-25 · CV-The Springs/E Martin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Stefaniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-11 · CV-The Springs/E Martin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Mannix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-11-29 · SHC-Jacobo · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christina Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-11-22 · SHC-Jacobo · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathi Hermanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-25 · SHC-Jacobo · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patty Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
W
2025-10-19 · SHC-Jacobo · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Perla Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-14 · SHC-Jacobo · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Perla Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-04-12 · SHC-Patrick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Metke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
Nicole Smith / Teresa Johnson
2025-02-08 · SHC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathi Hermanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-07 · SHC-Hancock · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Deeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-01-25 · SHC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 41.7% of games
6.0
37.5%
12W–20L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 30.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams