← Search

Julie Mathews

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
89 matches · 46W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
59%
stay 3.0
41%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
13 of 52
OR · 3.0
148 of 600

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Julie has gone from the 42nd to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.9% of games
6.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 58.9% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 38.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Gwen van Meter
+0.054better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dee Dee Elsey
+0.027better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Susan Block / Nancy Hoover
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patty Mamula
+0.012better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Press
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Lynne Bowman / Shawn Westmixedchamps
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · with Cheryl Lolich
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jon Bryant / Nancy Korenek-Levequemixed
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerome Deluz
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Debbie Ackroyd / Jeanne McGinnis
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patty Mamula
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Leanne Kong / Susan Putterman
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Dee Elsey
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Raquel Rich / Joyce Swift
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean Stevens
+0.029better than expected — took 92% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Julie McDevitt / Rita DeWeese
2026-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Lolich
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Nancy Kirsch / Claire C Gateschamps
2025-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Cheryl Lolich
−0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
May Chang / Dorothy Cofield
2025-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Lolich
+0.011better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.