← Search

Julie Mathews

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 46W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Mathews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-06 · LOTC-Rodegerdts/Conroy · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patricia Dorsa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · LOTC-Rodegerdts/Conroy · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Gwen van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · LOTC-Rodegerdts/Conroy · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dee Dee Elsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · LOTC-Rodegerdts/Conroy · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patty Mamula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-22 · LOTC-Semonsen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Press mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · with Cheryl Lolich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-01 · LOTC-Semonsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerome Deluz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-30 · LOTC-Conroy/Luthi · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patty Mamula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · LOTC-Conroy/Luthi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Dee Elsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · LOTC-Conroy/Luthi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Julie McDevitt / Rita DeWeese
2026-03-24 · LOTC-Conroy/Luthi · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Lolich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Cheryl Lolich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.7% of games
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.9% of games
6.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 58.9% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 38.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert