Search

Nancy Kirsch

Scappoose, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
71 matches · 51W–20L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
81%
stay 3.0
19%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
189 of 616

Nancy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Nancy has gone from the 85th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games
6.0
77.8%
35W–10L · 61.8% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Claire C Gates
+0.033better than expected — took 39% of games against 30% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Kristine Gardner / Dorothy Turchichamps
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · with Linda Harrold
+0.014better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claire C Gates
0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Susan Putterman / Ann Davidson
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Friedman
0.035below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Priester
+0.016better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Anh Pham / Anita Beck
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Friedman
+0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dar Dragoon
+0.011about as expected — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Beth Traphagen / ANN ROMANO
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claire C Gates
+0.075better than expected — took 92% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Janet Dowty / Corinne Stewart
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dar Dragoon
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Bishop
+0.022about as expected — took 28% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-03-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Maughan
+0.003about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Claire C Gates
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.