← Search

Nancy Atkins

Beaverton, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 79W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Atkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-05-14 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Major
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-05-05 · MPRC-Freier/Orlandini · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Schlickeiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · MPRC-Freier/Orlandini · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · MPRC-Atkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Douglas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · MPRC-Freier/Orlandini · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-03 · MPRC-Atkins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Schlickeiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-01 · MPRC-Freier/Orlandini · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-31 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Schlickeiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-26 · MPRC-Freier/Orlandini · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Kershaw · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Sivertsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Kershaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheri Martes Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams103 teams · 2008–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
40.3%
27W–40L · 45.8% of games
7.0
82.8%
24W–5L · 63.5% of games
8.0
52.4%
22W–20L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 37.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
46 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams