← Search

Tina Clancy

Camas, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 107W–68L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tina Clancy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2026-09-12 · VTC-Chiu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcelo Diversi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-12 · VTC-Pluymers/Griffith · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · VTC-Pluymers/Griffith · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rochelle Pluymers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcelo Diversi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Francisco Rivera-Giusti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-04-25 · VTC-Pluymers/Griffith · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorna Goth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Francisco Rivera-Giusti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcelo Diversi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · VTC-Pluymers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorna Goth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Francisco Rivera-Giusti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-01 · VTC-Pluymers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · VTC-Pluymers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
65%
26W–14L · 56.1% of games
4.0
50%
15W–15L · 51.7% of games
7.0
100%
8W–0L · 66.2% of games
8.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
65.2%
30W–16L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova