← Search

Donna Roisom

Wilsonville, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 100W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Donna Roisom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-04-30 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Havens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hector M Salomon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Havens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Goodfriend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-03 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Goodfriend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-02 · CHARB-Hamilton/Gray · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pauline Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-27 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Kralj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-27 · SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Caplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · with Gilbert Chiang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Jeff Fontaine / Judy Haeg
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · with Gilbert Chiang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-11-07 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-25 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Domagalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams118 teams · 2003–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.2% of games
4.5
30%
6W–14L · 42.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games
8.0
73.3%
44W–16L · 59% of games
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
51.4%
18W–17L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 28.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams