Search

Erica Tsuruta

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
96 matches · 55W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
156 of 266
OR · 4.0
286 of 498

Erica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erica has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Erica has gone from the 68th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
62.5%
20W–12L · 54% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
8.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
Sarah Wiggins / Katie Clawsonchamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Lynn Sosa
0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Neal
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · with Lynn Sosa
+0.014better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Grilley
+0.019better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kyoko Adcock
0.049below expectation — took 35% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Kathleen Schlickeiser / Marcia Baisch
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kyoko Adcock
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Sosa
0.016about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherri Sacconaghi
0.050below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherri Sacconaghi
+0.073better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 1-0
L
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Sosa
0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Sosa
0.045below expectation — took 48% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Lynn Sosa
+0.013about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.