Search

Deana Julka

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
97 matches · 69W–28L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
157 of 266
OR · 4.0
287 of 498

Deana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deana has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.0202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Deana has gone from the 48th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 71.7% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 66.8% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.4% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 65.8% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Trinchero
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · THPRD-Omlid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Trinchero
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Omlid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Trinchero
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
+0.025better than expected — took 52% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
0.031below expectation — took 28% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
0.027below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Judith Kobin / Stephanie Ostrom
2026-03-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
+0.010better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
+0.050better than expected — took 63% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kim
+0.007better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-03 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Herbst
+0.023better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Casebeer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Lowen
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.