← Search

Deana Julka

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 69W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Deana Julka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Trinchero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · THPRD-Omlid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Trinchero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Omlid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Trinchero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-03 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Casebeer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Lowen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 71.7% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 66.8% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.4% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 65.8% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova