← Search

Julie Bradford

Forest Grove, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 78W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Bradford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
L
2026-06-13 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Steffes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-31 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Steffes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Steffes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-14 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Sellke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-03 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Sellke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-25 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Sellke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Konen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.1% of games
4.0
35.1%
20W–37L · 43.5% of games
7.0
67.4%
31W–15L · 57.9% of games
8.0
30%
9W–21L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova