← Search

Carla Wheeler

Hillsboro, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 72W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carla Wheeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-05-01 · THPRD-Mohr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Sather
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · THPRD-Lee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neil Soiffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Suttich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · THPRD-Lee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shawn Boyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-10 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-20 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-22 · THPRD-Mohr · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Mohr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · THPRD-Mohr · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angelina Warriner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-09 · THPRD-Mohr · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rie Sasakawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-11-22 · THPRD-Lee/Sasakawa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · THPRD-Lee/Sasakawa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rie Sasakawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · THPRD-Lee/Sasakawa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rie Sasakawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.9% of games
4.0
37%
17W–29L · 44.2% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 45.7% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
3W–18L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
42 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova