Search

Jill Sather

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
120 matches · 45W–75L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
75 of 266
OR · 4.0
140 of 498

Jill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams85 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Jill has gone from the 61st to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.9% of games
4.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 42% of games
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.6% of games
9.0
15%
3W–17L · 37.8% of games
8.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 48.4% of games
9.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-07-19 · THPRD-Yuan/Martes Davis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Agus Rusli
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-17 · THPRD-Yuan/Martes Davis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with NANDA SIDDAIAH
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Daniel Albrecht / Stephanie Ostrommixed
2026-07-05 · THPRD-Yuan/Martes Davis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edmund Yuan
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · THPRD-Mohr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dongju Won
+0.017better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-30 · THPRD-Lee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Fenner
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Lee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Fenner
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · THPRD-Mohr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Mohr
+0.028better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Lee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edmund Yuan
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · THPRD-Lee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edmund Yuan
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · THPRD-Mohr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Wheeler
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · THPRD-Lee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shawn Boyce
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · THPRD-Mohr · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flor Harrigan
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.