← Search

Kirsten Holmes

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 40W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirsten Holmes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-05-31 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Strange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · IRV-Strange · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Buxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-05 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Buxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-14 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Palfreyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-01-11 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Buxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-15 · IRV-Porter/North · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Klinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-02 · IRV-Porter/North · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Rothert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-05-17 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Farrelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-12 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Storrs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-02-15 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara van Beckum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.6% of games
4.0
35%
14W–26L · 47.3% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams