Search

Courtney Storrs

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 35W–23L · seasons 20192026
Where Courtney sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Courtney is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Courtney has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Courtney has gone from the 28th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.8% of games
4.0
53.1%
17W–15L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacie Wise
+0.017better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacie Wise
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Holmes
0.032below expectation — took 63% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Donna Kennish / Julie Hansen
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela McIntosh
0.027below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Nenette Olson / Lucia von Flotow
2025-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Strange
0.013about as expected — took 57% of games against 61% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-01-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Strange
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-30 · #3 Doubles · with Sara van Beckum
0.049below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela McIntosh
0.014about as expected — took 58% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela McIntosh
0.029below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Klinger
+0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela McIntosh
0.045below expectation — took 40% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.