← Search

Mary Chennault

Kalama, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 106W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Chennault to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-07-12 · VTC-Won 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Won mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · VTC-Watkins/Chennault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sammy Bui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-10 · VTC-Watkins/Chennault · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sammy Bui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · VTC-Watkins/Chennault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Nadig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · VTC-Watkins/Chennault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Nadig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-17 · VTC-Watkins/Chennault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Nadig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-07 · VTC-Atchley/Watkins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Atchley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · VTC-Atchley/Watkins · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Nadig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · VTC-Atchley/Watkins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Nadig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-31 · VTC-Atchley/Watkins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Atchley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-18 · VTC-Atchley/Watkins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Atchley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · VTC-Atchley/Watkins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Atchley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2002–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
74.2%
46W–16L · 58.1% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
67.4%
29W–14L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer