← Search

Megan Meagher

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 48W–40L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Megan Meagher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-08-01 · MAC-Bell(s) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Halbert Luong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · MAC-Bell(s) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Schwerd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · MAC-Bell(s) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Donnelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · MAC-Bell(s) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Schwerd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darci Keljo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-01-17 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clarice Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-11 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
7W–0L · 71.8% of games
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.2% of games
4.0
54.5%
24W–20L · 53.9% of games
4.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#1 Singles
26%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova