← Search

Margaret Sivertsen

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 39W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Margaret Sivertsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-03 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Lindsay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomoko Hori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Kershaw · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Atkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Kershaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-08 · N OR-THPRD-Hockman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Gram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-19 · N OR-THPRD-Hockman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Gram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-18 · THPRD-Kershaw/Sivertsen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · THPRD-Kershaw/Sivertsen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Murrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-10 · N OR-THPRD-Hockman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Gram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-12 · THPRD-Kershaw/Sivertsen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomoko Hori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-21 · THPRD-Sivertsen/Davis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2011–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
41.9%
18W–25L · 45.8% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 55.6% of games
8.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.4% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe