Search

Barbara Griffin

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
3%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
15 of 60
OR · 3.5
225 of 735

Barbara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barbara has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Barbara has gone from the 38th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
56.8%
25W–19L · 50.6% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Semon
+0.019better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheena Raffaele
+0.019better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Martin
+0.038better than expected — took 86% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Terrill
+0.040better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Eargle
0.016about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Stecher
0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Creps Weaver
+0.014better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Maguire
+0.033better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Lake
0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Stecher
0.022below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kiersten Lake
+0.038better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Eargle
+0.023better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.