← Search

Barbara Gram

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 127W–131L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Barbara Gram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
L
2026-09-13 · THPRD-Sienko/Morris · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-12 · MAC-Bourland · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ian Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
Linda Dallof / Annie Nguyen
2026-07-06 · Volley Dolls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-03 · Volley Dolls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Stevenson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · with Jay Hopson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Chresten Gram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.6% of games
3.0
48.5%
33W–35L · 50.8% of games
3.5
25%
12W–36L · 37.7% of games
6.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.2% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
65.3%
32W–17L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
120 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
49 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer