Search

Barbara Gram

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
256 matches · 127W–129L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
91%
stay 3.0
9%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.89 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
138 of 357
OR · 3.0
235 of 600

Barbara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams70 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barbara has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Barbara has gone from the 65th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.6% of games
3.0
48.5%
33W–35L · 50.8% of games
3.5
25%
12W–36L · 37.7% of games
6.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.8% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.4% of games
7.0mixed
65.3%
32W–17L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history256 matches
L
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Linda Dallof / Annie Nguyen
2026-07-06 · Volley Dolls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Miller
0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-03 · Volley Dolls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Miller
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Stevenson
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Helen Lee / Andalib Khanmixed
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Tammy Cofield / Angie Cunningham
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stevenson
+0.019better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Scott
0.032below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · with Jay Hopson
+0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · with Chresten Gram
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Planck
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chresten Gram
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.