← Search

Jayne Mitchell

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 45W–78L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jayne Mitchell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MPRC-Tompkins/Hazel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Conan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Dave Ramm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Putterman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-WHRC-Moreno · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Parth Pandey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Douglas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Pinkowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-05 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Lanier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-04 · NOR-WHRC-Moreno · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Parth Pandey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-03 · NOR-WHRC-Moreno · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Maginnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-03-29 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ian Schnadig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-24 · NOR-MPRC-Turchi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leanne Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams98 teams · 2006–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.7% of games
3.5
16.1%
5W–26L · 37.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
7.0
30%
6W–14L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
12W–26L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova