Search

Judy Friedman

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
130 matches · 59W–71L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
271 of 357
OR · 3.0
448 of 600

Judy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Judy has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02020202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Judy has gone from the 71st to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.5% of games
3.0
17.4%
4W–19L · 37.1% of games
6.0
58.5%
31W–22L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history130 matches
L
Janet de Morgan / Mary Rousseau
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandy Swift
+0.060better than expected — took 25% of games against 12% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Susan Putterman / Jayne Mitchellchamps
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Jane Comerford
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Geschwind
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Kristi Tompkins / Patricia Dorsa
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claire C Gates
+0.030better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Maughan
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Best
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Susan Putterman / Ann Davidson
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Kirsch
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sasaki
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Anh Pham / Anita Beck
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Kirsch
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amy Korkowski / Susan Neighbors
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathryn Todd
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Nicole Kennely / Erin Nunn
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Kaufman
0.031below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sasaki
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.