Search

Dave Sasaki

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
63 matches · 21W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 2.5
89%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.62. Higher than today’s 2.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
49 of 52
WA · 3.0
741 of 755

Dave is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams45 teams · 2007–2026
GLVR-Kasch
2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
PT&E/SJRC-McTague/Quinn
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
PT&E/SJRC-McTague/Hesslink
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
GLVR-Kasch
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
PT&E/SJRC-McTague/Quinn
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dave has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dave has gone from the 22nd to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
10W–20L · 44.2% of games
6.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
Lori Andersen / Chris Krantzmixed
2026-05-24 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hilary Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paull Kaady
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Nancy Rosenbloom / Doug Zennmixed
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yone Akagi
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Charles Eastwood / William Gilchrist
2026-04-28 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Geschwind
0.057below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · GLVR-Kasch · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Friedman
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-25 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Carey
0.016below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hilary Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-18 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Geschwind
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-13 · GLVR-Kasch · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Friedman
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-06-25 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #2 Doubles · with Michael McTague
+0.008about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Prakash Kondepudi / Phillip Luchamps
2022-06-24 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #2 Doubles · with Michael McTague
+0.013about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Dave Sato / Surendranadh Movva
2022-06-05 · PTC-McTague/Quinn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Darienzo
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.