Teams

GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Winston Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Paul Preston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Ed de la Fuente
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Robert Hesslink
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Lars Kasch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Scott Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Jeremy Geschwind
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Mark Darienzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Michael McTague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Dave Sasaki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Paull Kaady
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
James Carey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Winston Young
57W–59L career
0%80%20%
3.01
3
Paul Preston
31W–41L career
0%75%24%
3.00
3
Ed de la Fuente
78W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Robert Hesslink
70W–52L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
Lars Kasch
32W–61L career
2%96%2%
2.77
3
Scott Quinn
74W–62L career
1%99%0%
2.75
3
Jeremy Geschwind
33W–57L career
9%90%1%
2.68
3
Mark Darienzo
16W–25L career
14%85%1%
2.66
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
14%86%0%
2.63
3
Dave Sasaki
21W–42L career
16%84%0%
2.60
3
Paull Kaady
5W–12L career · type S
19%81%0%
2.59
3
James Carey
54W–35L career
17%83%0%
2.58

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.