← Search

Yone Akagi

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 66W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yone Akagi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
L
2026-08-01 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with CHRISTOP JOHNSON mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-19 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luis Ponce de Leon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sasaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-04-24 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Alley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-03 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shari Matyas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-14 · PTC-Browne Hoffman/Alley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Best mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-07 · PTC-Traylen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Zuber Marshburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · PTC-Browne Hoffman/Alley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
L
2026-02-14 · PTC-Browne Hoffman/Alley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
48.6%
36W–38L · 50.3% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.9% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70.6%
24W–10L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer