Search

Yone Akagi

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
118 matches · 66W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
4%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
166 of 357
OR · 3.0
280 of 600

Yone is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams42 teams · 2014–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Yone has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Yone has gone from the 39th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
48.6%
36W–38L · 50.3% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.9% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.7%
24W–9L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history118 matches
W
Scott Fish / Wendy Vailmixed
2026-07-19 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luis Ponce de Leon
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Crowley
+0.026better than expected — took 55% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Nancy Rosenbloom / Doug Zennmixed
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sasaki
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Kathy Cooke / Cecily Schmidt
2026-04-24 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Alley
0.028below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Crowley
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Irene Wang / Amelia Nelson
2026-03-29 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shari Matyas
0.020below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Crispin Wong / Susan Eldridge
2026-03-14 · PTC-Browne Hoffman/Alley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · GLVR-Kasch · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Best
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Elena Shackelford / Starlyn Corley
2026-03-07 · PTC-Traylen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Zuber Marshburn
+0.044better than expected — took 50% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · PTC-Browne Hoffman/Alley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 4-5
L
Deb Landau / Anabel Capalbo
2026-02-14 · PTC-Browne Hoffman/Alley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-13 · PTC-Traylen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Zuber Marshburn
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.