← Search

Angela Jackson

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
55 matches · 21W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
300 of 357
OR · 3.0
500 of 600

Angela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Angela has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Angela has gone from the 4th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
26.9%
7W–19L · 40.2% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin DeVoto
+0.086better than expected — took 100% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin DeVoto
−0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Lara Lunsford / Lauren Kimmel
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sima Desai
−0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Elise D Harvey / Ying Deng
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser
−0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nozomi Bray
−0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 4-5
W
Ann Meditz / Carrie Scott
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin DeVoto
+0.029better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Annie Lamb / Barbara Roozenboom
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Townsend
−0.012about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laney Kibel
−0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-07 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.015about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Alana Miner / April Razey
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Cooke
−0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Matt Savage / Alana Rheamixed
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rich Brown
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eryn Hoerster
−0.037below expectation — took 17% of games against 40% expected
5-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.