← Search

Laney Kibel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
28 matches · 12W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
W
2025-11-16 · IRV-Townsend · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sima Desai
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-27 · IRV-Townsend · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-17 · N OR-IRV-Plowman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sima Desai
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-11-03 · N OR-IRV-Plowman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Buchanan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-25 · IRV-Vickers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Padden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-03-28 · IRV-Vickers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charlene Russell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-11-18 · IRV-Townsend/Plowman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin DeVoto
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2023-11-11 · IRV-Townsend/Plowman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-08-16 · IRV-Vickers/Scotten · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Knocke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-06-29 · IRV-Vickers/Scotten · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Donna Keller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-27 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Chung
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-06 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Vickers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
35%
7W–13L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams