← Search

Joyce Swift

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
72 matches · 15W–57L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
19%
stay 2.5
81%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 65% stay · 35% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.47. Lower than today’s 2.57 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
15 of 37
OR · 2.5
26 of 64

Joyce is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joyce has been a steady 2.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.02.5202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Joyce has gone from the 0th to the 4th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 30.8% of games
2.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 33.8% of games
6.0
13.9%
5W–31L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Shackleton
+0.021about as expected — took 14% of games against 19% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Linda Underwood / Janel Mussman
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laureen Thorsen
−0.024below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Susan Thomashow / Barbara Lolich
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cherie Sivell
+0.062better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Tomoko Langworthy / Nancy Lowenberg
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Kviz
−0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raquel Rich
+0.050better than expected — took 42% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raquel Rich
−0.014below expectation — took 8% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Carol Bremner / Susan Bradley
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minhhang Tran
+0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Karla Hendrickson / Patty Booth
2025-11-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cara Partch
+0.070better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Tamee Baffaro / Shelley Hutley
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Westby
+0.037better than expected — took 52% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Sima Desai / Laney Kibel
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Rodakowski
−0.036below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Caryn Leach / Simone Frank
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Shaffer
−0.058below expectation — took 0% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Priscilla Connolly / Theresa Hagerty
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Bawnik
−0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.