← Search

Kimberly Shaffer

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 12W–53L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Shaffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-05-03 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hiroko Ishikawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jody Yates championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-31 · THPRD-Tran/Kviz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Wales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-29 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Shih
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · Lori Andersen · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Andersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
L
2026-03-28 · Lori Andersen · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Krishna Kasturi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
L
2026-03-12 · THPRD-Tran/Kviz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Wales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-03-07 · Lori Andersen · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Hyun Jeong Min mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
2026-02-13 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Shih
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-06 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-17 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Shih
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 47% of games
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 16.4% of games
6.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 34.5% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
6.2%
1W–15L · 27.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer