← Search

Jody Yates

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 25W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jody Yates to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-06-06 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chelle Kenison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Shaffer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-04 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heidi Seinige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-08 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chelle Kenison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hiroko Ishikawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-04 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-07-15 · Andersen/Farrell-The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jann Purdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-12 · Andersen/Farrell-The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-24 · Andersen/Farrell-The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
55.9%
19W–15L · 53.1% of games
3.0
9.1%
3W–30L · 29.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova