← Search

Heidi Seinige

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 10W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Heidi Seinige to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-05-02 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jody Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-29 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Mixed Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
2026-03-01 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Gloria Pacheco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
L
Jodel Fernandez / Chili He
2026-02-21 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Ariana Tunmore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
L
2026-02-14 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Mixed Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
L
2026-02-01 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Chelsea Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
L
2026-02-01 · SAC-Henkhaus/Tunmore · #2 Mixed Doubles · 6.0 · with Brandon Campos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
W
2025-10-05 · SAC-Koeberl 5.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-20 · SAC-Koeberl 5.0 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-30 · SAC-Seinige/Pacheco · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.5% of games
2.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.4% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
10%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert