Search

Margaret Jacobsen

Oregon City, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
119 matches · 69W–50L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 38 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
261 of 600

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Margaret has gone from the 91st to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.4% of games
3.0
66.7%
24W–12L · 55.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 41.2% of games
6.0
90%
9W–1L · 71.1% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
L
2026-07-19 · Balls to the Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Belott
0.002about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · Balls to the Wall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Belott
+0.042better than expected — took 52% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Erin Corzine / Deanna Williams
2026-07-09 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
0.050below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.040better than expected — took 32% of games against 24% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
0.045below expectation — took 59% of games against 72% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Teresa Zhao / Emily James
2026-06-14 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
0.032below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.034better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
+0.014about as expected — took 38% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Lauren Kinderknecht
2026-05-23 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Yamin
2026-05-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.047better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Becca Perry
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.