Search

Julie Poetsch

Damascus, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
90 matches · 41W–49L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Damascus · 3.0
4 of 5
OR · 3.0
530 of 600

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Julie has gone from the 15th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
53.4%
31W–27L · 52% of games
3.0
30%
3W–7L · 44.8% of games
2.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
Lindsay Jenkins / Lauren Kinderknecht
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Lamb
0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Martha Tolentino / Wendy Vail
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Lamb
+0.055better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Erin Corzine / Andrea Sanchez
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Anderson
+0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Lamb
+0.044better than expected — took 41% of games against 28% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Ann Jensen / Roxanna Johnson
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Lamb
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Megan Brown / Colleen Atherton
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Corzine
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Sonja McIntosh / Kristan Summers
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elena Kochetkova
+0.041better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maarten Schreuder
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maarten Schreuder
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Jeannette Shupp / Carrie Scott
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Kimmel
+0.057better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Jing Bennett / Julia Pickar
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Mosbrucker
0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alana Miner
+0.025about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.