← Search

Amory-Katelyn Zschach

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
54 matches · 28W–26L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
57%
stay 3.0
43%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
86 of 357
OR · 3.0
142 of 600

Amory-Katelyn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amory-Katelyn has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Amory-Katelyn has gone from the 61st to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.9% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 37.2% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 85.7% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 36% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
L
Erin Corzine / Deanna Williams
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
−0.050below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
−0.044below expectation — took 59% of games against 72% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Teresa Zhao / Emily James
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Jacobsen
−0.032below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Partch
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Owens
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
+0.023better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Gwen Kulak / Heidi Funke
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Owens
−0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Lisa Johnston-Smith / Lorri Asder
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
+0.029better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
+0.036better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
JEAN CHEN / Jeane Anastas
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Glenn
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Jacobsen
−0.014below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Lea Rodgers
2026-03-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.027below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.