← Search

Amory-Katelyn Zschach

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Amory-Katelyn Zschach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-09-12 · GLVR-Byrd/Gill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Collin Bundy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-09 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Partch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 55% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 20% of the time
#2 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe