← Search

Katie Macadam

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 33W–14L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Katie Macadam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-09-12 · SHC-Romano · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aidan Showalter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Hilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Hilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-19 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Hilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Megan Mandel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Robin Browne Hoffman / Lorri Asder
2026-06-13 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 57.6% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
28 matches
#1 Female Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams