← Search

Megan Mandel

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 42W–29L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Megan Mandel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-03 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Katie Macadam championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Macadam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Robin Browne Hoffman / Lorri Asder
2026-06-13 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Macadam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 54.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.1% of games
6.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
20%
14 matches
#2 Singles
13%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Female Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer